What to watch for when Brett Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford testifies

usatodayopinion Felony sexual assault has no Statute of Limitation. The victim(s) should notify the LE jurisdiction in which the allegations occurred. (New Haven) An investigation can ensue (or not). Let the chips fall where they may. Otherwise-STHU.

usatodayopinion This isn’t a court trial...beyond a reasonable doubt does not apply.. one of them is lying....ask yourself... WHY WOULD SHE LIE? She has nothing to gain.

usatodayopinion His wife’s face says it all. GUILTY.

usatodayopinion The media knows Kavanaugh is innocent. They keep ignoring the enormous holes in the accusations.

usatodayopinion Dems just want to tarnish his image for momentum into the midterms. It is in fact a con! That’s how disgusting politics are today. Obama exploited Garland and now the left is destroying the reputation of a good man for political gain.

usatodayopinion Finally. The news media stating the accusations for what they really are. No definitive conclusions can be drawn as to the character of Kavanaugh in light of the accusations.

usatodayopinion They can't. No one can.

usatodayopinion Dr Ford has no chance for a fair hearing. The all male GOP members have made up their minds. Couple this with she being questioned by a prosecutor who will treat her like she was the abuser. Sad state of affairs. We must correct this in November. rememberinnovember.

usatodayopinion They don’t need to. How about having the FBI conduct an investigation? The reasonable doubt comes when five separate accusations have been made by credible victims and witnesses.

usatodayopinion She claims there were three boys, yet she has never filed a criminal complaint against ANY of them. Moreover, the fact she is only going after Kavanaugh means her agenda is politically motivated.

usatodayopinion It is all tainted, smeared, and out of hand. There are other people suitable for the job! Republicans now stand on a matter of principle and for what ? Move on. You're all a laughing stock proven by what happened in front of the UN to Trump as you stand behind him.

usatodayopinion Why does it seem that these hearing spectacle is really looking like a scene out of the movie The Crucible?

usatodayopinion Going to be very interesting tomorrow

usatodayopinion Yeah. Where's the blue dress?

usatodayopinion Not even his wife believes him. Check out that side eye.

usatodayopinion It’s not a jury trial. They don’t need reasonable doubt. They need to feel that Dr. Ford is credible and that should be enough to question the wisdom of putting Kavanaugh on the SCOTUS. Simple as that.

usatodayopinion If they needed to then this should be moved to a courtroom for a real trial. SupremeCourtJustice vaguelyunreasonabledoubtenough

usatodayopinion That is not the standard. Why is this hard to grasp. He is applying for a job. He is not on trial. If there is any legitimate doubt, why give him the job.

usatodayopinion They don't need to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt for purposes of the hearing, it's an interview, not a trial.

usatodayopinion Good thing it’s a job interview and not a trial

usatodayopinion They can’t. But it won’t matter. Enough of the rhinos will vote no, giving cover to the red state Dems

usatodayopinion You can’t ruin ppls lives on heresy. Just ask yourself, if someone made accusations about your character if you would want evidence? I know I would.

usatodayopinion This is not a trial.

usatodayopinion That’s what it will take. Real evidence. Not 30 year old asinine allegations where the parties admitted to being drunk or being willing accomplices to assault with no corroborating evidence.

usatodayopinion This is ridiculous. You don’t need to convict Kavanaugh to have enough reason to be uncomfortable putting him on the Supreme Court.

usatodayopinion

usatodayopinion Preponderance of the evidence🙄

usatodayopinion That is the look of a scared teenage boy. KavaNO KavanaughT

usatodayopinion That is not the standard

usatodayopinion So the other accusers mean nothing? How many does it take for them to be taken seriously? These fossils in the GOP could have video evidence and would still vote to confirm him.

usatodayopinion Good thing this is not a criminal trial then...

usatodayopinion You think? All allegations against him have no evidence or witnesses to back them up. The Democrats gave taken the resistance to a low level.

usatodayopinion Beyond a reasonable doubt os not required. BelieveSurvivors MeToo StopKavanaugh ibelievewoman

usatodayopinion Is reasonable doubt the standard for judicial confirmations? How about preponderance of evidence?

usatodayopinion They don’t have to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt. THIS ISN’T A CRIMINAL TRIAL. It’s a job interview.

usatodayopinion Yeah, it's not a trial. If it was we would get... wait for it... an INVESTIGATION!!!!!!!

usatodayopinion Doesn't have to be "beyond reasonable doubt", not a criminal proceeding

usatodayopinion Irresponsible post. It doesn't matter. Not a criminal trial

usatodayopinion It’s not a legal proceeding, so it does not have to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. It is a test if credibility. You should kniw this before you write about it.

usatodayopinion The GOP sure do love their rapists, pedophiles, and Catholic Priests. My bad, child molesters on the 3rd one.

usatodayopinion The bar for our Supreme Court is not "beyond reasonable doubt". It is "above reproach". Do people not read the Federalist Papers anymore?

usatodayopinion Shocking corruption under the democrats!!! Ford is Lying 🤥

usatodayopinion Lock her Up Ford is Lying 🤥

usatodayopinion Meaning..they can’t.

usatodayopinion Good thing this isn’t a criminal trial then.

usatodayopinion Duhhhhh

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Everything the GOP questioner asked Dr. Ford at the Kavanaugh-Ford hearingHere is Rachel Mitchell’s full line of questioning to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans chose the Arizona prosecutor to question Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Our government is broken. How did it happen so fast? Not everything...what was in the envelope Sheila Jackson gave to Fords attorney They chose Mitchell because they were afraid that the attack Senators would be revealed. The goal was to have a softer version of questioning, and she succeeded. The problem was that she softened the rage that Kavanaugh was expressing. So, they released the hounds
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Everything the GOP questioner asked Dr. Ford at the Kavanaugh-Ford hearingHere is Rachel Mitchell’s full line of questioning to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans chose the Arizona prosecutor to question Ford, who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford tentatively agrees to testify ThursdayFord's lawyer agreed Saturday to testify before Congress about her allegations that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted her. Men are starting a meneither movement in support of saying the behavior Kavanaugh is accused of is NOT ok to normalize Then the SC should “tentatively” agree to wait for her I don’t understand the delay. Either you have something to say or you don’t.
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »

Trump Today: President challenges Kavanaugh’s accuser and says nominee is ‘under assault’President Donald Trump on Friday challenged the woman who has accused his Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault, saying charges would have been filed at the time of the alleged incident if it was “as bad as she says.” "innocent until proven guilty" Trump remember Jeffrey Epstein Guess he should feel lucky because this is pretty common among women late to never reporting and even less men report otherwise perhaps some of that “p...y grabbing” he bragged about without consent would had him wearing an orange jump suit by now😂
Source: MarketWatch - 🏆 3. / 97 Read more »

Brett Kavanaugh, wife and Christine Blasey Ford all receiving death threats: GRAPHIC LANGUAGEChristine Blasey Ford and the wife of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh have both received death threats after Ford, amid the judge's confirmation process, accused him of sexual assault. Unhinged leftists, no doubt The MSM is calling her a victim already and they have democratic politicians on their shows using scare tactics...it's drumming up a terrifying response. Sick disgusting people especially these far left activist women,threatening another mother with children most disgusting thing ever
Source: FoxNews - 🏆 9. / 87 Read more »

'I don't see any possibility' Christine Blasey Ford is mistaken about Kavanaugh, sister-in-law saysThe sister-in-law of Christine Blasey Ford, the college professor who's accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her when they were teenagers, said on 'Good Morning America' that 'I don't see any possibility' that Ford is mistaken. Deborah Ford I guess she was there? How wonderful to be proven guilty before any judicial proceedings... looks like the USA has tossed out the rule of law & put in place countless numbers of... Judge Roy Bean Yea she is hey she can’t remember any details. Yahoo why are you always on the side of Liberals your right up there with Google FakeNews WalkAway KAG realDonaldTrump
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Reuters Top News @ReutersSenate hearing with Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Supreme Court nominee Kavanaugh of sexual assault, continues I’m only now tuning in and my heart is bleeding for this woman. The GOP is a shit show Event sponsored by Coke? She remembers so little within the last few months let alone 36 years ago.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »