NCAA Leaders And Their Advocates Convey A Message Obscuring The Truth About Name, Image And Likeness Rights

  • 📰 Forbes
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 66 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 30%
  • Publisher: 53%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

NCAA leaders and their advocates seem to be conveying a message that obscures the reality of college athletes' name, image and likeness rights. While it is important to have a diversity of viewpoints, lawyers and reporters need to use sincere effort to avoid innuendo that may at times skew the deck.

Of course, poor draftsmanship and subtle misstatements happen at many times, even within an association of highly trained lawyers. But, when it comes to the NCAA’s battle against granting college athletes full control over their name, image, and likeness rights, these little slips of the pen seem to be happening more commonly than one would naturally expect — especially when those close to the NCAA sit on an association’s board or are the primary authors or quoted sources of an article.

While this small, arguable snafu by a Sports Lawyers Association press release is probably not too relevant when looked at in a vacuum, the use of subtle twists of phrases intended to give a dubious, negative inference about granting college athletes more economic rights is happening all over the place where NCAA advocates are involved.

While I can point to a number of other examples where subtle tilts of verbiage are intended by NCAA advocates to cast the college athletes rights movement in a dubious and subtly negative light, another example that hits very close to home involves an article published on FORBES back in January by a fellow contributor, entitled “.

Indeed, there is no good faith argument that granting college athletes rights over their names, images or likenesses would be thecause to any Title IX violation, despite the intended inference by certain NCAA advocates to the contrary.

If one wishes to be earnest about this undeniably sensitive topic, anyone writing about the Fair Pay to Play movement, irrespective of viewpoint, needs to concede at least a few, undeniable points. First, some female athletes are very strong supporters of the movement to grant college athletes NIL rights. Specifically, former Stanford University women’s volleyball player

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 394. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

‘Conspiracy bingo’: Trans-Atlantic extremists seize on the pandemicCivil rights advocates have warned for months that the coronavirus could aid recruiting for the most extreme white-supremacist and neo-Nazi groups. I like it how the guy on the right looks concerned like he broke quiet time and now the teacher is yelling at him kinda vibe they don't need the coronavirus to do that, they have the poster boy of nazism in the White House to give them aid and comfort. So far , the Democrat governors are the only ones acting to the extreme.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

The Supreme Court Isn’t Eager to Let Faithless Electors Blow Up the 2020 ElectionThe Electoral College is an undemocratic anachronism. But this isn’t the way to get rid of it.
Source: Slate - 🏆 716. / 51 Read more »

Andrew Cuomo Finally Provides Sign Language Interpreter After Deaf New Yorkers SueHis daily COVID-19 briefings had been the only one by a governor without the televised service, disability rights advocates said.
Source: HuffPostWomen - 🏆 27. / 68 Read more »