Supreme Court seems reluctant to unbind 'faithless electors' who could 'create chaos' in presidential contests

Other members of the court said if the challengers were right, states could do nothing to disqualify electors who took bribes or voted for clearly unqualified candidates.

In more than half the nation, electors are required to obey the results of their state's popular vote and cast their ballots accordingly. The problem of"faithless electors" who disregard the popular vote outcome has not been much of an issue in American history, because when an elector refuses to follow the results of a state's popular vote, the states usually simply throw the ballot away.

Colorado tossed Baca's vote out and found another elector who voted for Clinton. So he sued, and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals based in Denver ruled that electors can vote for any legitimate candidate. The Supreme Court took both cases to decide which outcome is the correct one. The court ruled in 1952 that states do not violate the Constitution when they require electors to pledge that they will abide by the popular vote. But the justices have never said whether it is constitutional to enforce those pledges.

Democraps wanting to change our constitution AGAIN for their personal gain but they ALWAYS invoke the constitution when it's convenient for them

Our founding slave owners/fathers wanted a non all powerful executive branch AND didn't believe the voting populace at the time (white guys) had the intelligence to objectively elect a competent administrator of the executive branch. Well we can see everyday what a joke it is now

List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at

Why change the intent of the Framers ? Who wants several Cities or several States Rule us

Turkish forces are doing what they did to exterminate the Armenians in Qatar with heavy weapons bombing civilians in Qatar and killing most of the ruling family

ABOLISH the ELECTORAL COLLEGE!

I have a better idea, constitutional amendment where the office of the President is elected by popular vote. 1 person, 1 vote. What a novel idea!

In other words, the Supreme Court doesn’t think we’re ready for democracy quite yet.

Pssssttttt ObamaGate

And rightly so.

It’s not like half the country understands it anyway. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court battle over Donald Trump's finances carries risks for all three branchesThe high-stakes battle could result in historic rulings on a president&39;s immunity from invesigation while in office and Congress&39; oversight powers. What a colossal waste of time. He has at least $100 as he gave me a tip and so what and who cares how much money he has or does not have it is none of anyones business to know so shut the fuck up and go get a life instead of running down a man trying to save a sinking nation
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Mexican Supreme Court throws out law extending governor's mandateMexico's Supreme Court on Monday unanimously struck down a law extending the gubernatorial mandate of a member of President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador's ruling party which had fed concerns it could lead to broader changes to term limits. Where is the new president? What is he doing to support his population?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court conservatives lean toward shielding religious schools from suitsConservative U.S. Supreme Court justices signaled sympathy on Monday toward a bid by two Catholic elementary schools in California to avoid discrimination lawsuits by former teachers in a case that could make it harder to hold religious institutions liable in employment disputes. Exodus 14:13 🤬🤬🤬 Of course they are.
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Will The Supreme Court Finally Force Trump’s Tax Returns To Be Released?Remember President Trump’s tax returns? It seems like a relic from the distant past, but only last December, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a trio of cas… Nope, this is America, not China The biased Roberts court? Doubtful. If they don't this country is completely lost
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »

6 things to watch as the Supreme Court hears Trump's effort to block subpoenasThe Supreme Court will hear three cases on Tuesday that present its most important exploration of the separation of powers in decades. The disputes test the ability of the US House of Representatives and state prosecutors to investigate a president, arising from stalled efforts to obtain financial records from President Donald Trump. Wait which president are we talking about. Hard to keep track lately
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »