Supreme Court appears poised to let states keep 'faithless electors' out of the Electoral College

  • 📰 cnnbrk
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 23 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 13%
  • Publisher: 55%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court appears poised to let states keep 'faithless electors' out of the Electoral College

Arguments spanned over two hours with the justices delving into history and discussion ranging from Alexander Hamilton to Frodo Baggins.By the end of arguments, some justices seemed prepared to reject arguments from lawyers for so-called faithless electors and hold that states can bind their vote.The case comes as the election season is heating up and the Electoral College will once again be front and center in an increasingly polarized and volatile political atmosphere.

A $1,000 fine was upheld by the state Supreme Court. The US Constitution, the court held,"grants the states plenary power to direct the manner and mode of appointment of electors to the Electoral College."In Colorado, the legal outcome was different when Micheal Baca voted for Ohio Republican Gov. John Kasich instead of Clinton. Baca's vote was rejected and he was removed and replaced with a substitute who voted for Clinton.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

The EC also was originally to have the electors vote their individual consciences, instead of as a block. The Electoral College has long since outlived its original purpose and should be DISMANTLED.

If you abolish the EC, you of little knowledge, NYC and California will call a of the shits. And they have the worse picked around. The EC has worked for 200+ years to represent ALL of America. They want to abolish it bc they're losing. Ppl are waking up to the corruption.

Can't trust Trump trash

Good, then let's get rid of this ancient way of voting... There are too many ways for all to be heard. Let's keep it simple. Majority rules per state I suppose, and let each state have 2 sides in the house and Senate ... Too easy. Reform

billy_capgun

That sounds unconstitutional

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Hydroxychloroquine works and yet you deny it. Hydroxychloroquine cost $37 for 100 tablets. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 'stands to lose 100 million dollars' on a coronavirus vaccine from Bill Gates. Cost $1000 vaccine.

The Electoral College as originally designed where the voters voted for an Elector, not a candidate, and then the Elector chose the presidential candidate. Faithless electors should be allowed.

The only thing that transpires is that the Dems are for ANYTHING that will make it easier to commit VOTER FRAUD. The rest is hogwash.

Related to if Europeans are Americans or just a problem born inside America!

convict you. You are being a patriot! Just BYPASS_SCOTUS since they will not put country before party (3/3).

again by not having information they should have prior to the election. Whoever has access to Trumps financial info. JUST RELEASE IT TO THE INTERNET/PRESS. What is Trump gonna do? Even if he figures out who did it there isn’t a jury in the country that will (2/3)

The Not-So-Supreme Court will return a bullsh*t decision which will enable Team Trump to drag out past the election, the release of his financial info which may show his alleged; money laundering/loans with Russia & bank fraud. Americans will be disenfranchised (1/3)

WTF?

So much for the separation of church and state.

Fake news

obamagate

Politics and the morals of religion is an oxymoron. Funny how the general public actually believe the phony facade and blasphemy of politicians

“Two justices, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh, worried that if a faithless elector's pledge could not be enforced by the state, chaos might ensue after the election.” So only 1 *actual* justice worried about it. Let’s be honest, a Trump-appointed Justice isn’t a real justice.

I don't know why we have luciferians in our government

The electoral college needs to be thrown out! The popular vote is the true vote of the people, by the people! Period!

Time to end the Electoral College. Time for the popular vote to choose the President!

I who did everyone nomad a Democrat or Republican we are the citizens and people of the United States of America we should be voting to improve our country because we are American citizens I mean just the taxpayers immigrants and welfare recipients not included

Good, make sure people’s votes count

Then the electoral college no longer serves its purpose, and hasn’t for some time. I’m glad we have now codified its obsolescence.

2020 election should be postponed until 2024 because democrats are trying to sabotage the economy for personal gain, just like they are already doing in CA. Lock up all democrats!

China has to be taught a lesson

How about the Supreme Court dump trump and Barr. The 2 most faithless traitors on the planet. realDonaldTrump GOP GOPChairwoman ChiefJustice0 BrettKavanaugh Scotus

That defeats the entire purpose that the founders made the electoral college for.

Good

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

They just don't want Trump to win because they same states that helped him win in 2016 will vote for him again and he'll win another 4 years

Fuck the electoral college

This dumb system needs to be abolished

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 393. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Listen Live: Supreme Court Considers Pivotal Electoral College CaseThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments right now in a case about the Electoral College — a decision that could affect the outcome of all future presidential elections. Listen to the arguments here ⬇ let's see how they screw this one up Мы демократическая республика? Консерваторы на SCOTUS Kompromat Watch them torch Democracy, live!
Source: NPR - 🏆 96. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court to debate whether 'faithless electors' can stay in the Electoral CollegeAs election season heats up, the Supreme Court will hear two cases Wednesday that could shake up the Electoral College. At issue in the disputes is whether states can bind presidential electors to vote for the state's popular-vote winner. Welcome 2 the 2020 stolen election. The crew is back together. All the crooks will work relentlessly to ensure the Orange man wins the ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES again, not the popular vote. This country is going to HELL IN A HAND BASKET. The poor (we’ll be desolate) the rich well? Hey, I wonder what the cases are called. We don't know because you don't bother putting that in the articles. The electoral college was basically created to give flyover states more voice than they deserve in respect to their population.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court justices worry about 'chaos' in Electoral College disputeU.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday grilled lawyers advocating that 'electors' in the complex Electoral College system that decides the winner of U.S. presidential elections are free to disregard laws directing them to back the candidate who prevails in their state's popular vote. Ranked choice or bust but was dildo baggins brought up? the lesser known hobbit WTF?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Supreme Court justices warn that Electoral College cases could lead to 'chaos'Some of the justices of the Supreme Court warned on Wednesday that striking down state laws that require Electoral College voters to follow the will of their state's popular vote could lead to 'chaos' in future presidential elections. That means..who wins the popular vote wins. Just like any other election ever held, except for being the president I wonder: How would they describe our society at this moment? SCOTUS Don't overthink this or create an issue that won't exist until you create it. Simple. Ban winner take all as depriving 50% - 1 percent of voters of their vote. Apportion the votes! Require electors to vote for the candidate they were elected to vote for. Slim.
Source: CNBC - 🏆 12. / 72 Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court begins hearing presidential Electoral College disputeU.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday began hearing a dispute involving whether 'electors' in the complex Electoral College system that decides the winner of U.S. presidential elections are free to disregard laws directing them to back the candidate who prevails in their state's popular vote. Democrats lost so know they want to cheat lol it will go no where,you can’t change the constitution lol What happened to doing that on state level? How many more states would we need to avoid the Electoral College? What's up with the guy in the picture?
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »