President Trump's pre-presidential financial records were the subject of Tuesday's arguments before the Supreme Court.The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a pair of cases involving President Trump's financial records, decisions that could have profound consequences not only for the 2020 presidential election but also for executive power.Trump v. Mazars— ask whether Congress has the power to subpoena the president's personal records except during an impeachment proceeding.
But Justice Neil Gorsuch asked:"Why should we not defer to the House's view of its own legislative purposes?" That argument, said Justice Elena Kagan, challenges a"fundamental precept of our constitutional order is that the president is not above the law."
What “profound consequences?” The executive branch is NOT above the law.
records should only b supplied if there is proof of a crime.....no fishing expedition.......everyone knows meuller witch hunt gang poured thru them for 3 yrs
Oh stop. He's not going to have to show them.
Nothing on the illegal spying of the Trump administration Seems more important then prying into financial records, no?
Hope Supreme court doesn't cross legal line.
wont make a difference. its TrumpAdministration, TheJusticeDept along with supreme court are all Conservatives who will pull their ConstitutionalRights hats conveniently over justice or whats best for Americans. NothingToSeeHere people it will be denied!
More and more employers are asking to see your tax returns before hiring you. So if that is not illegal to do, then we the people, want to see President Trump's Returns before he can run for president.
'Balance of power' describes international politics 'Separation of power' or 'separated powers' describes relations among the 3 branches of US govt: Article 1 Congress, Article 2 Executive, Article 3 Judiciary kcalamur NinaTotenberg nprpolitics
Those books are so cooked, they are chard.
I hope the GOP led Supreme Court remembers that what they do for Trump now will also stand for any future Dem Presidents.
It is not about balance of power. It is about whether private citizens can run for the Presidency without harassment, or whether only insiders of the political club can run.
But he wants the media to focus on “Obamagate”. A conspiracy so secret, Trump himself, can’t explain.
Well then let them be made available from day one. Then the American people will know who the criminals are.
Let's see whether Trump's nominated SCOTUS justices defend Constitution or put president who nominated them above the Law.
Profound consequences including dismantling democracy in favor of authoritarianism. Trump will never leave. There will not be an election on Nov. 3.
ginsburg made material apparently false statement
This is what I heard from the Supreme Court this morning; 'Some future president might be burdened in some way if we allow Trump's dishonesty and criminal activity to be exposed...' The fix is in.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »