Legal battle over Donald Trump's financial records, tax returns begins in Supreme Court

  • 📰 Newsweek
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 54 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 25%
  • Publisher: 52%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The cases are set to be among the first in the court's 230-year history to be heard via teleconference, a precaution taken during the coronavirus pandemic.

For the first time since he became president, Donald Trump's personal financial dealings will be the subject of scrutiny for the Supreme Court.

Again, the president requested that the Supreme Court hear the case after a lower court ruled against him. In a petition to the High Court last November, Trump's legal team argued that the"threat that state criminal process poses to a president cannot be overstated." The congressional subpoena from the House Oversight and Reform Committee demanded eight years of Trump's financial records from the accounting firm Mazars USA. The probe by the Intelligence and Financial Services committees sought more documents from two of Trump's major lenders, Deutsche Bank and Capital One.While all three cases raise separate legal questions, Trump's team has largely argued that he is immune to investigation and indictment as a sitting president.

The Manhattan district attorney's case is a bit more complex. The Department of Justice has held that presidents have immunity from criminal prosecution in federal cases during their term in office. Wright said he could"see the court extending that to state criminal law cases."

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Trump doesnt want the public to see he's taxes. Then they wiuld see he's a fraud. He doesn't want people to know he owes 100s of millions of dollars the Russian oligarchs. No bank in America will loan him money. He's bankrupts everything he touches.

You can bet the Democrats are using taxpayer money to fight this battle and not their own out of their pocket They have in the past. don’t you think you have a better place for your taxpayer money to be spent Than looking for dirt on the president

no comment usa

He’ll show it all. Nothing to hide POTUS

What is so bad that he desperately needs to hide them

A real test to see if the rule of law still prevails

I bet SCOTUS will verdict If Trump is POTUS he is above every law under the sky. He has been so meticulously planning Judges appointments for this day. Quid pro quo

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 468. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court battle over Donald Trump's finances carries risks for all three branchesThe high-stakes battle could result in historic rulings on a president&39;s immunity from invesigation while in office and Congress&39; oversight powers. What a colossal waste of time. He has at least $100 as he gave me a tip and so what and who cares how much money he has or does not have it is none of anyones business to know so shut the fuck up and go get a life instead of running down a man trying to save a sinking nation
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

Skeptical judge could hold up Trump administration's bid to clear Flynn -legal expertsThe notoriously independent-minded federal judge who once said he was disgusted by the conduct of Michael Flynn could block the administration&39;s bid to drop criminal charges against the former adviser to President Donald Trump, legal experts said. The Department of Justice on Thursday told U.S. You used the wrong word of skeptical judge,it should be Leftist judge !! The kind that Justice Roberts said there was none of,that we all know was a lie!! Bs Doubtful 🤞🏽
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »