is giving insight into the deliberations that convicted the disgraced media mogul of third-degree rape and criminal sexual act in the first degree.plus one charge of rape in the first degree, which spared him the possibility of a sentence that included life in prison.in an interview that aired Friday, Drew, who served as juror number nine and asked to not use his last name, said that deciding which charges to convict on was not an easy task.
Drew said that although he personally found Sciorra's testimony"compelling," these were "serious allegations" and the prosecution put a"high burden" on themselves in bringing these charges. Drew said the jury regretted that its attempt at"clarification" on Friday was"mistaken" as a signal that the jury was close to a guilty verdict, which wasn't the case at that point. The jury sent out a note to the judge late Friday asking if they could reach a partial verdict on three counts but not on the two most serious.
"There is no message," Drew said."We were there to do a job, to make a decision based on the information that was presented to us and we have absolutely no stance or voice or opinion as to any type of larger movement."Harvey Weinstein verdict: What will 'a new era' mean to #MeToo, Hollywood and sex-crime prosecutions?"There was no gender bias, there was no race bias," Drew said."I thanked them on four or five occasions for the civility.
PatChaney20 🤣🤣🤣💋 With Special Spin by Gayle King. { Precious ❤️)
Good for him. You don’t convict people based on “ movements”.
Did Gayle ask about Kobe and Denver?
That’s funny, the lady that KNEW HarveyWeinstein was a rapist is interviewing the juror!
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: Variety - 🏆 108. / 63 Read more »