Britain's Court of Appeal on Thursday ruled in favour of environmental campaigners who oppose the building of a third runway at London's Heathrow Airport, Europe's busiest.
The legal action against the approval was brought by various London councils, environmental groups including Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, and London Mayor Sadiq Khan.'No account of Paris' Notably, Heathrow airport - which is owned by a consortium led by Spanish construction giant Ferrovial - said it would appeal Thursday's ruling.
Mr Johnson, who wants big infrastructure projects to help drive Britain's post-Brexit economy, earlier this month gave his backing to HS2 high-speed railway line that will link London with major cities in central and northern England - even though construction will ravage ancient woodlands and wildlife.
"I'm delighted by the decision handed out by the court of appeal," the London mayor told reporters outside the court. "As part of the global campaign against climate change, this is really important ... Cancelling the third runway would send a really powerful message out to the rest of the world."
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Proposed changes to the national anthem are 'perfectly reasonable' | Sky News AustraliaSky News host Alan Jones says proposed changes to the national anthem are “perfectly reasonable”. \n\nOlympic Gold Medalist Cathy Freeman has come out in support of the Recognition in Anthem Project, which argues the current anthem 'doesn't acknowledge Indigenous existence in Australia”. \n\nThe Recognition in Anthem Project - founded by former Victorian Supreme Court judge Peter Vickery QC - launched its proposal for an updated version of Advance Australia Fair. \n\nIn Advance Australia Fair 2.0, the 'inappropriate and now outmoded word, young' would be replaced to read 'Australians all let us rejoice, for we are one and free'. \n\nThe project presents further changes to the anthem in verses two and three. \n\n“You would have to be a bit of a ratbag to say that’s worth dying in a ditch for,” Mr Jones said. \n\nImage: Getty Can we also acknowledge left handed people, oh and redheads as well. Thank you very much They are already acknowledged. What on earth do you think, 'Australians all let us rejoice', means. We're all Australians, so we're all acknowledged in it. Far out. Stop with the divisive agendas. It's Sick to continually push agendas to try and create division! The NATIONAL anthem is about the NATION of Australia, which only came into being 1901. That has nothing to do the length of time aboriginals have been living in the Australian Continent.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »