Amnesty International has repeatedly documented people and communities being marginalised and put at risk by development projects.
It is here we find Beijing's very clear motivation for entering the human rights debate at all: it is entirely self-serving.When China says critics are"interfering in internal affairs", it really means human rights obligations can be ignored if it is in the national interest. But when Mr Xi has been urged to address human rights concerns, rather than listening, Beijing has gone on the attack.
Except if you’re JacquiLambie, then trading them for undisclosed gain is okay
. Yet... every day the ABC runs stories that support or justify the loss of Australians' rights. Disengenuiously reporting Aus domestic data capture as a means to stop paedophilia for example. Our rights are not to be traded away! .
Don’t try this “ rights “crap on China 🇨🇳- they can shutdown economy in no time. Politicians sold us to them and now we have to bow low to them
they r treating muslims in the same way as US treatingIS It is OK for US to have Guantanamo but not OK for Chinese Double standard
A bit rich when Australia has removed freedom of speech.
It's never win win with China. Only they win - the West loses.
When China says anything, one better think hard about what China means (to deflect from).