SC orders ABS-CBN to comment on OSG’s quo warranto petition

  • 📰 manilabulletin
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 75 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 33%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday morning, February 11, ordered ABS-CBN Corporation to file its comment in 10 days on the government lawyers’ quo warranto petition to forfeit the legislative franchises of the television firm and its subsidiary, ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc.

Aside from the comment on the petition, ABS-CBN Corporation was also directed to answer the plea of the Office of the Solicitor General for the issuance of a temporary restraining order that would stop immediately the operation of the firm’s Kapamilya Box Office , a subscription channel where viewers can watch movies for a fee.

“Acting on the Quo Warranto Petition filed by Solicitor General Calida on behalf of the Republic against respondents ABS-CBN Corp. and ABS-CBN Convergence, Inc. the Supreme Court in today’s En Banc session, required the respondents to file their comment to the said petition for Quo Warranto within a non-extendible period of 10 days from receipt of notice,” Hosaka told journalists covering the SC.

Published reports stated that ABS-CBN’s franchise will expire next month. Several bills have been filed in Congress for the renewal of the franchise.“We want to put an end to what we discovered to be highly abusive practices of ABS-CBN benefitting a greedy few at the expense of millions of its loyal subscribers. These practices have gone unnoticed or were disregarded for years.

“ABS-CBN abused the privilege granted by the State when it launched and operated a pay-per-view channel in ABS-CBN TV Plus, the KBO Channel, without prior approval or permit from the National Telecommunications Commission. While it is true that broadcasting is a business, the welfare of the people must not be sacrificed in the pursuit of profit.

“This simply means that mass media companies operating in the Philippines must be 100 per cent Filipino owned because they play an integral role in a nation’s economic, political, and socio-cultural landscape. On the day the petition was filed, ABS-CBN Corporation said it did not violate the law to warrant the forfeiture of its franchises.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Nagtututuro ang ABS-CBN ng iba para damay-damay na. 😀😊😁

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 25. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

SC the wrong place for complaint vs ABS-CBN – legal expertThe Supreme Court will likely dismiss Solicitor General Jose Calida's petition to cancel ABS-CBN's franchise, with a legal expert saying the complaint has no factual basis and is filed before the wrong venue. ow? wanna bet? surely SC will dismiss it in april 2020 citing moot & academic, coz ABS CBN's franchise expires at the end of march! The quo warranto case filed by SolGen just ignited the fire and has swung the pendulum to ABSCBN. People love underdogs.
Source: CNN Philippines - 🏆 13. / 63 Read more »

EXPLAINER: Legal points in Calida's quo warranto vs ABS-CBNIs the Supreme Court the proper venue? What does this mean for PDRs? And what is the effect on House deliberations? Quo waranto or Power tripping,Both sounds the same today Tnx, Rappler 👍🏼 ‘didn’t see much of articles as 👍🏼as this when it was u guys who were on the hot seat, aside fr those coming fr u as a response/explainer. backtracking to CJ Sereno after SC voted, the legislators did not raise the issue of “right forum” anymore...(can’t recall) YesToABSCBNShutDown
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »