'Outdated': Legal loophole allowing wombats to be killed has been scrapped

  • 📰 theage
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 21 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 12%
  • Publisher: 77%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

More than 4000 wombats are legally killed as 'property pests' each year by landowners in eastern Victoria, but that is about to change

last year, which revealed Chinese high rollers were travelling to parts of Victoria to hunt wombats for sport.Tom Zhou had organised junkets for high rollers at Crown Casino. His company's website had stated the first thing tourists should feel in Australia is to be a wilderness hunter in the mountains.

"Hares, foxes, wombats, wild ducks, red deer, sambars ... a variety of wild animals to spend a happy holiday with you." The changes announced by Ms D'Ambrosio bring the rules covering wombats in line with those covering other wildlife. Greens environment spokesman Sam Hibbins said a "non-lethal and humane" approach was necessary in dealing with controlling wombat populations.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Thank goodness for that! Our wildlife is so precious - especially now & we need to save every single animal & my goodness, thank you to all the wonderful people working so tirelessly to do that. We can never repay you for your blood, sweat & tears

Unless you're indigenous. In which case you're allowed to chase and stone them to death, laugh and have it posted on social media

For people that have them burrowing under their houses in the middle of the night, this might be a problem. Not for the city slickers obviously, but for the people that allow you to have fresh milk for your lattes.

TimHarcourt 😧

What is wrong with this country !!!!

firstdogonmoon But, but, but they are still being shot 'WITH A PERMIT'. That is not protection...

firstdogonmoon I want someone to work out how we can keep some native fauna as pets/neighbours to displace cats (maybe quolls?).

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 8. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

'Not lawful debts': Robodebt legal warning came on same day scheme was suspendedGovernment lawyers warned the Tax Commissioner the controversial robodebt program could be illegal on the same day the Federal Government suspended the scheme. A truly nasty business. So many innocent people got caught up in this, had their meagre welfare payments cut and were threatened with prosecution over it. Disgraceful. Shame on you Department of Human Services. The quality, life experience, maturity and common sense of many senior public servants within the APS is well below what the tax-paying public expect and demand. A devoutly religious man who hounded poor people, some to their deaths.
Source: abcnews - 🏆 5. / 83 Read more »

'We saw this coming for years': Farmers take legal action after firesSix farmers are preparing to take legal action arguing a massive bushfire in northern NSW could have been prevented if more hazard reduction had been allowed. AlexSmithSMH This is going to be interesting AlexSmithSMH As stated in the article. These farmers want land clearing. Just what we need after we lost 5000000 hectares of bush land is the clear more bush land. Sure more hazard reduction burns, but you can see the underlying desire which is good for no one but the farmer in the short term AlexSmithSMH Yet more incessant moaning from farmers Greedy self serving grubs When do we wake up to the fact that they are a blight on the landscape massive welfare dole bludgers, employers of third world labour at the expense of local jobs $20 Billion a year in subsidies cost us dearly
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

'We saw this coming for years': Farmers take legal action after firesSix farmers are preparing to take legal action arguing a massive bushfire in northern NSW could have been prevented if more hazard reduction had been allowed. AlexSmithSMH This is going to be interesting AlexSmithSMH As stated in the article. These farmers want land clearing. Just what we need after we lost 5000000 hectares of bush land is the clear more bush land. Sure more hazard reduction burns, but you can see the underlying desire which is good for no one but the farmer in the short term AlexSmithSMH Yet more incessant moaning from farmers Greedy self serving grubs When do we wake up to the fact that they are a blight on the landscape massive welfare dole bludgers, employers of third world labour at the expense of local jobs $20 Billion a year in subsidies cost us dearly
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »