Public protector's findings on President Cyril Ramaphosa contradict the evidence - lawyer

Ngcukaitobi, arguing on behalf of Ramaphosa, said Mkhwebane was given a detailed breakdown of the facts regarding expenses of his CR17 campaign. However, despite having those facts, she still ignored them.

"Not a cent went to President Cyril Ramaphosa. In fact, he paid R37m of his own money to the campaign," Ngcukaitobi argued. The North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria is hearing Ramaphosa’s legal application for a judicial review of Mkhwebane’s report on the R500,000 donation made by the late CEO of Bosasa, Gavin Watson, to Ramaphosa’s 2017 campaign to become ANC president.

Ngcukaitobi said despite there being no evidence that Ramaphosa benefited, Mkhwebane still however reached a conclusion that the president among others enriched himself and his son from the donations. "He [Ramaphosa] was a contributor to the campaign as opposed to receiving money from it. Her findings contradicted the evidence... she makes a conclusion of fact with no basis," argued Ngcukaitobi.

IsaacPat It's not a matter of side, but being factual.

IsaacPat Huh, this is confusing

IsaacPat One of the best legal minds in this country.

IsaacPat Kanti this NgcukaiWhatWhat ungakuliphi iSide?

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

LIVESTREAM: Mkhwebane back in court over CR17 campaignPresident Cyril Ramaphosa and his legal team are in court to try aside Public Protector's report into Ramaphosa's ANC presidential campaign. Believe me she is gonna lose again🤣🤣🤣 Most of us not working but people from the Parliament wasting money on non-ending courts, just do as done to any other criminal 99% of Foreigners in our restaurants like Eagle Rock Spur at Forest Hill Mall/Centurion.What about us,our brother's and sisters from Matric ?
Source: eNCA - 🏆 49. / 51 Read more »