Hillary Clinton attacks Senate Republicans over Trump impeachment | Sky News Australia

2016 Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton says Republican Senators have "put the interests of one president over the interests of all Americans". Ms Clinton comprehensively lost the electoral college vote in the 2016 Presidential Election to now President Donald Trump.

In recent times she has accused multiple US political figures - such as former Democratic presidential hopeful Tulsi Gabbard - of being Russian assets. Ms Clinton took to Twitter to express her outrage over the refusal of the US Senate to allow witnesses in Donald Trump's impeachment trial. "The only remedy now is for us all to vote in overwhelming numbers to replace them and him in November," she said.

My favourite whoopsy

Hillary, shut up

O dear Hillary, of course your nose is out of joint. Stick it up somewhere else.

You lost HillaryClinton you lost!! Accept it and go away!! YOU LOST swampmonsterhillary

Hillary who?

Does anyone other than the media still care what that partisan hack thinks?

Paranoia is a heavy burden.

And if anyone with half a brain would listen to anything this cow would say.

That is a bold statement coming from Clinton....that used any political office to get money.

That’s correct

Interests of ALL Americans is that you are NOT President or in any government office!!

Wrong again killary... tis you and your minions doing that..

Hahaha- Hillary cares about the interests of all Americans. As if. Doesn't she have another Goldman Sachs speech to do. HRC--- STFU

Hilary, you lost get over it - the people didn’t want a crooked lawyer !

Just saying 😳

Can someone urgently let Hillary know that she lost the election.

Hangs around like a bad fart 💨

And the vote in the congress ? What was that all about Hillary ?

More DNC propaganda Sky ? 🤮🤮🤮🤮

She is right.If he has nothing to hide let the witnesses speak blocking them makes Trump look guilty.And he is..

But then, he's impeached for life, and House investigations of his crimes will continue.

What a dill she is

Of course she's 100% correct. The Senate 'trial' was literally a coverup, of witnesses and documents. A total disgrace.

Will she ever go away?

HillaryClinton is such a disappointment to the Deep State, now they all Lose

Bullshit and you ..What about the people you killed in Libya and let's not forget the 860 million that Australia gave your so call foundation...Yet you have not given a thing for our fires...not even a word of sorrow

Who?

They can always vote him out in November

Are you serious HillaryClinton . Pot kettle black... uspolitics Clinton

Thankfully she is still not the president.

Why isn’t she in jail?

Some people need to learn to accept defeat gracefully

The majority of the Republicans would all love Trump to be gone but they would never vote a Republican out of office on what despite being a breach of his powers it was not significant enough. It is because of this they have chosen to protect themselves. They know Trump can win!!

The same HillaryClinton who worked tandem with BarackObama, that paid foreigners for a dirty dossier, framing Trump as a Russian asset, who coordinated with CIA, FBI, DOJ and FISA courts to illegally spy on Trump and subvert the 2016 election, that Hillary?

Maybe....but she still ain’t President.

Another empty cliche. This impeachment hss been a set up all along.

I hope she's going to have another run for president so she can be embarrassed/humiliated twice over and have to blame aliens instead of the Russians this time for fixing the election! Trump2020NowMoreThanEver

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Senate acquittal of Trump 'likely' and 'bipartisan' | Sky News AustraliaSky News contributor John Jordan says it appears an acquittal of President Trump is likely and could even be 'bipartisan' as senators question House managers and Trump lawyers for the second day.\n\n'It looks like the Republicans have the votes to bring an end to the trial. A lot of my sources are telling me there may be one to three Democrats who will vote with Republicans,' Mr Jordan told Sky News. \n\nHouse Democrats have urged senators to vote to call for witness testimonies, especially that of former Trump Security Adviser John Bolton.\n\n'It's really difficult to understand what Bolton would say. Whatever he does say, it's contravened by his praising of President Trump's handling of Ukraine in the past,' he said. File this under BS. One word, Dodgy! Has he even been watching? That is garbage.
Source: SkyNewsAust - 🏆 7. / 78 Read more »

US Senate votes against Trump trial witnessesBreaking: The US Senate has voted against calling witnesses and collecting new evidence in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial, clearing the way for his likely acquittal in the coming days Isn't presenting evidence and hearing witnesses the whole purpose of a trail? Boo hiss. It is a pantomime, after all.
Source: smh - 🏆 6. / 80 Read more »

US Senate votes against Trump trial witnessesBy a narrow vote, the Republican-controlled US Senate has stopped the Democrats' drive to hear testimony from witnesses like former national security adviser John Bolton in Donald Trump's impeachment trial. Triggered? Hilarious how the age tries to make out an IRRELEVANT witness for Democrats may have changed the outcome when the fact is if witnesses were voted for, the 17 witnesses+1 hidden would have been crossed examined & exposed for the frauds they are😂 Hilarious how MSM makes out an IRRELEVANT witness for Dems may change the outcome when the fact is if witnesses were voted in17 witnesses+1 hidden would've been crossed examined & exposed for the frauds they are & Trump witnesses would have sunk Dems in the Swamp 4 sure!😂
Source: theage - 🏆 8. / 77 Read more »

Trump defence team’s stunning new argumentDonald Trump’s legal team has offered a controversial new argument in his defence, with the President’s impeachment trial approaching its most critical phase. It's a perfectly presentable legal argument based upon a consistent rationale and established precedent. Not sure why you feel compelled to describe it as 'bizarre.' Actually, I know exactly why you choose to do so. And so do you. Fakenews auspol Hmm, I wonder whose word we should take on whether this is a 'bizarre' legal argument? Top constitutional lawyer and academic Alan Dershowitz, who is just about to get Trump acquitted. Or perpetually wrong leftard fake news 'journalist' samclench. 🤣🤣🤣 Try again, Sam. And while this money wasting circus continues...the President is continuing to M.A.G.A!
Source: newscomauHQ - 🏆 9. / 77 Read more »