Supreme Court lawyer 'can't think of something more dangerous to our democracy' than Dershowitz's Trump defense becoming precedent

  • 📰 Newsweek
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 51 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 24%
  • Publisher: 52%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Neal Katyal, who served as the Acting Solicitor General, said that Dershowitz's defense of President Trump could set a dangerous precedence for future presidents.

A Supreme Court lawyer said in an interview with MSNBC on Thursday that he could not think of anything"more dangerous to our democracy" than the arguments of President Donald Trump's defense lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, in Trump's ongoing impeachment trial.

Neal Katyal, who served as the Acting Solicitor General from May 2010 to June 2011, made the remarks in an interview with Chuck Todd, host ofIn the interview, Todd referred to Dershowitz's argument in the Senate trial that Trump's"quid pro quo" deal with the Ukrainian government did not constitute an impeachable offense.

"You can't acquit him on the basis of the facts, because the factual record is against the president, and the president hasn't even bothered introducing any facts into his defense," Katyal said."So, I think the only way you could read an acquittal tomorrow is on the basis of the Dershowitz argument, which would be, I think, one of the most destructive precedents to have existed in our nation's history.

WATCH: Alan Dershowitz's argument that quid pro quo is not impeachable would be"one of the most destructive precedents to have existed in our nation's history," former Acting Solicitor General

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Republican Senators are in effect co conspirators with Trump Administrations impeachable offenses & coverup by ignoring their solemn oath & wittingly turning their backs on the American people, the Constitution & rule of law for the sake of a corrupt Republican party & President

Cc SenatorCollins lisamurkowski senrobportman MittRomney SenatorRomney SenAlexander

Agreed, it will be more exciting moving forward if the party opposite of the President's would focus mid-term election campaigns on impeachment, 'abuse of power' and 'obstructing congress' are so vague and subjective that impeachment will be a standard post-election process

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 468. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Dershowitz: Trump can't be impeached because he believed his reelection is in the national interestThe retired Harvard law professor said that Trump’s demand for Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden is not an impeachable offense because the president was acting on the belief that his reelection is “in the public interest.” stableford Fuck! Is this the best Harvard Law School can do ? I know someone who thinks he should not have been arrested for robbing a bank, because he thought it is was in the national interest.... stableford Is he trying to Riff On Mark Twain? Is Mr. Trump 'a noisome bacillus'? stableford His re-election is not in my best interest!
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »