The Supreme Court could upend consumer financial protection as we know it

  • 📰 CNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 41 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 20%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The Supreme Court is hearing a case about the future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and justices may rule the agency to be unconstitutional. That would throw the status quo into disarray.

Congress created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2010 when it passed the Dodd-Frank financial-reform law, giving it a mission to protect Americans from unfair, deceptive and abusive financial practices.

Oversight of consumer finance was previously "scattered across government" and laws "escaped regular federal oversight," according to the CFPB website. The agency has recovered more than $12 billion for consumers to date, according to a Consumer Federation of America report published in March last year. The agency's activity has dropped off under the Trump administration, the report says.Christopher PetersonThe plaintiff in the Supreme Court case — Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — questions the legality of the agency's unique structure.

Opponents of the agency, which receives its funding from the Federal Reserve, have called for Congress to structure it as a multi-member commission similar to a federal regulator like the five-member SEC.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Great. 👎

Excellent!! Beware of any govt agency who says they want to protect us.

Good it was abused by the last administration.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 12. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

A 'faithless elector' betrayed his state's voters. You won't believe why.Colorado's Micheal Baca had a far-fetched plan to stop President Trump. Now it's before the Supreme Court. One more reason Get rid of the electoral college Your head line is such clickbait I actually was rerouted to Buzzfeed, had to take a quiz to find out what ice cream flavor I am and then I was allowed to read the articl Masky_Jay_Hoody Its wrong! If his state picked clinton he had a duty to pick her too! Otherwise who the hell is he to decide?
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Roberts pivotal as U.S. Supreme Court tackles public aid to religious schoolsThe U.S. Supreme Court appeared divided on Wednesday in a major legal battle ove...
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »

Polish conflict over judges heats up after vote, court rulingThe conflict over judges in Poland deepened on Thursday, as a supreme court ruli... These judges have broken the constitution! 3:29 AM · 24 янв. 2020 г
Source: Reuters - 🏆 2. / 97 Read more »