The switch to water from the Flint River occurred in 2014 and months later, the city announced there was fecal coliform bacteria detected in the water supply. The legal battle began in the months that followed.Lawyers for the city asked the justices to step in and block the lawsuit, claiming their clients had immunity from such suits. In an unsigned Tuesday order, the court declined to do so, allowing the lawsuit to continue.A federal appeals court previously ruled in favor of the residents.
"Knowing the Flint River water was unsafe for public use, distributing it without taking steps to counter its problems, and assuring the public in the meantime that it was safe is conduct that would alert a reasonable person to the likelihood of personal liability," the 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals held.Read More"Any reasonable official should have known that doing so constitutes conscience-shocking conduct prohibited by the substantive due process clause," the court said.
Are the people finally realizing that it was and is their local Democrat politicians that have been running their city into the ground?
City officials real estate debasing middles economic prosperity (ownership wealth tool) access intentionally disrupted Vancouver SAN Fran west east Toronto next Mtl dev land for fines vs mandatory affordable builds
WHAT?!!!!! BS! The Government Is Supposed To ENSURE We Are SAFE!!! 5 Members of SCOTUS ARE Just As EVIL And Corrupt As THE CULT GOP!! FIRE THEM NOW!
Obama should pay it. He’s wealthy enough now and he’s not paying his fair share. Who knew you could go from walking with cardboard in your shoes to being a multi multi multi multi multi millionaire just for getting into politics?Obama needs to pay his fair share.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
10 years after landmark Citizens United Supreme Court decision, record cash flooding US electionsTen years ago this week, the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v FEC, a landmark ruling that unleashed billions of dollars into American election campaigns. And that’s not how it should work Everything that is going on today is a direct result of this awful, awful decision. Isn’t that how we make a difference nowadays? Voting and donating to the campaign we support. Without money, no outsider will ever have a chance..,
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court takes up church-state separation in Christian schools caseMontana told the Supreme Court that 'barring aid to religious institutions promotes religious freedom by preventing the government from using its leverage to dictate religious policy.' the biggest problem is this is something short lived both millienials and gen z are 50% each more spiritual then religious or religious nones by 2050 only 12% of americans will be practicing any christian religion Here we go...Republican’ts sold their followers on theory that Dems were going to allow Sharia law to take over our democracy while they were actually plotting to create a Christian theocracy in the US. Religion is the root of all evil. Separation of Church and State.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »
Supreme Court battle over school choice may boost religious freedomKendra Espinoza gets her latest day in court Wednesday as she fights the decision to discontinue a program that helped fund tuition scholarships. Religious schools are basically private schools and they should fund themselves. No state or government funds should go to these schools is it sensible &/or a sign of intelligence ... ... to preach any 1 of ~4000 competing religions - that nobody can prove & against all the evidence. Are we surprised if we *think* we have mentalhealth challenges?
Source: USATODAY - 🏆 100. / 63 Read more »
Religion and school choice on the line in 'crucial' Supreme Court caseThe case is a major test for the balance between dueling constitutional principles: protection for religious freedom and a prohibition against government support of religion. The radical right wing religious terrorists will do whatever they can to eradicate the separation of church and state. This is their way of getting their“foot in the door to begin chipping away at our constitution. If they get one case in front of the SC the floodgates will open! You call yourselves a news organization. Calling a pro gun rally a white supremacist rally. I found the white supremacist, the governor of Virginia Ralf (blackface baby killing) Northam!!!! The case is a major test for the balance between dueling constitutional principles: protection for religious freedom and a prohibition against justice league support of religion.
Source: ABC - 🏆 471. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court Declines to Fast-Track Appeals on Affordable Care ActThe Supreme Court’s action means it won’t consider the Obamacare case this term, while lower court rulings have placed the health law in limbo. Trump and GOP should do universal healthcare so Dems can't. It would be epic. Another win for Trump, but the GOP better get their health care shit together. Helping Trump.
Source: WSJ - 🏆 98. / 63 Read more »
Supreme Court won't hear Obamacare case before electionThe decision deals a blow to Democrats’ hopes to elevate the issue in 2020, but it will come as a relief to Trump and Republicans, who’ve been wary of the lawsuit’s potential to scramble their election hopes. The Supreme Court rejected Democrats' request to expedite review of a lawsuit threatening Obamacare MikeLastort Lazy Supremes... Sitting on their perch... Collecting pay.. Doing nothing... Why do we need these people again? Couldn't they just be replaced with housecats and sloths?
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »