Chief Justice Roberts won't compel witnesses to testify at Trump impeachment trial, legal expert says

  • 📰 YahooNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 44 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 21%
  • Publisher: 59%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Jeffrey Rosen tells Yahoo News that Chief Justice John Roberts will almost certainly avoid weighing in on whether President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial should include testimony from witnesses.

Chief Justice John Roberts is almost certainly going to avoid weighing in on whether President Trump’s Senate impeachment trial should include testimony from witnesses, legal expert Jeffrey Rosen told Yahoo News.

“I think there’s certainly merit to the idea that we may get a quicker ruling from a chief justice in a Senate trial, if it ever came to that, than we would get by going months and months on end litigating the matter. There’s no guarantee of that, but I think that it’s entirely possible,” Schiff said on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Nov. 24.

Story continues“Under the Constitution he has to be there for it, but I think at every turn [Roberts] will look for ways to have as small a footprint as possible,” Adam White, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, told Yahoo News last fall. “He is very, very wary of the courts being seen as being brought into a political process.”

“It will mean that either Justice Roberts or the Supreme Court itself is not really a conservative justice or court, merely a partisan one,” Schiff said.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

But there is a scenario, if witnesses are allowed, where Dems could move to have a witnesses declared irrelevant. A ruling if irrelevancy might be overruled by 51 senators but would they rather Chief take the heat and not?

I have read that violates law & our Constitution.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 380. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

How Chief Justice John Roberts would preside over the politically charged Trump impeachment trialLongstanding Senate rules say Roberts, as the presiding officer, may rule on key issues about evidence, including 'questions of relevancy, materiality, and redundancy.' But whatever he concludes can immediately be overturned by a simple majority vote. So Roberts Rules of Order don’t necessarily apply in the Senate? Whoever made these rules up needs to be fired. Bill Clinton is impeached for life, and is a serial rapist to boot.
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »

Chief Justice to be ‘master of ceremonies’ more than judge at Senate impeachment trialLongstanding Senate rules say Justice Roberts, as the presiding officer over an impeachment trial, may rule on key issues about evidence, including 'questions of relevancy, materiality, and redundancy.' Judge John Roberts was the Perfect choice for the Trials. He's pretty 'no-nonsense'.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Google legal chief leaving amid sexual misconduct troublesThe company said Drummond is not getting an exit package as part of his departure. His compensation package for 2018 was worth $47 million, making him one of the company's highest-paid employees, according to regulatory filings. You have done terrible things We'd like you to stay till the end of the month please Penises gonna penis I bet someone with say it is because he's black and earning $47 million, making him one of the company's highest-paid employees, according to regulatory filings is just evidence of racism (they couldn't have a black person on top, blah, blah etc).
Source: NBCNews - 🏆 10. / 86 Read more »