The high court added that the petitioner, Atty. Jesus Nicardo Falcis III, also violated the principle of hierarchy of courts and failed to raise an actual justiciable controversy. The SC likewise said Falcis has no legal standing.
Articles 1 and 2 limited marriages between man and woman while Articles 46 and 55 mentions lesbianism or homosexuality as grounds for annulment and legal separation. The SC noted in its decision last year that it “recognized protracted history of discrimination and marginalization faced by the lesbian, gay, bisexual transgender, queer, intersex and other gender and sexual minorities community, along with their still ongoing struggle for equality.”
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Angara lauds SC for starting Judges-at-Large programSenator Juan Edgardo “Sonny” Angara has lauded the Supreme Court’s move to partially implement the Judges-At-Large Act by opening 50 initial positions, saying this is a significant step towards providing a faster resolution of pending cases in the courts.
Source: manilabulletin - 🏆 25. / 51 Read more »
SC should have taken jurisdiction over provincial bus ban issue – Rep. GarbinAKO Bicol Party-list Rep. Alfredo Garbin Jr said Sunday that the Supreme Court should have taken jurisdiction over petitions questioning the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority’s (MMDA) ban on bus stations along EDSA, citing that there are
Source: manilabulletin - 🏆 25. / 51 Read more »
Supreme Court junks same-sex marriage case 'with finality'JUST IN. The Supreme Court upholds its decision to junk the same-sex marriage petition that was once touted as historic for the predominantly Catholic country. FULL STORY: 💔😢 BASURA 'From its plain text, the Constitution does not define, or restrict, marriage on the basis of sex, gender, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression,' WHY NOT fucking allow it THEN?
Source: rapplerdotcom - 🏆 4. / 86 Read more »