Rep. Clyburn: We’re not going to be part of a rigged system

  • 📰 MSNBC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 1 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 4%
  • Publisher: 51%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

Majority Leader McConnell 'made it very, very clear that he’s not interested in having a fair trial, he’s interested in rigging a system, and going through a process that will eventually acquit this president.' - Rep. James Clyburn

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.

Ha ha ha they are playing the democrat game .!!! DoNothingDemocrats

This is very rich gaslighting from a guy who was silent when the Republicans were screaming about the process being unfair for months. This is simply a case of what you were doing place it on your opponent

Clyburn your going to be impeached for saying on television your threat to “ HANG “ the president ..that’s treason and tyranny

Clyburn was ALREADY part of a rigged system. The outcome in the House was pre-determined and a disgrace to the institution. Keep pushing the wedge deeper.

Clyburn was part of the rigged House vote, so he’s wrong.

People if Moscow Mitch does not want a fair trial, we should make him recuse himself of it. Because there is no compromise here. We need witnesses and the truth to be substantiated.

Rigged system? Please ask any Dem. Congres member.: where are the 2 whistleblowers? Where are the transcripts of their written and oral testimonies? When will the minority day be held?

The only fair thing that is going to happen in this process is deciding weather or not to prosecute the leading Dems with reason or tyranny. Life sentence in jail or the death penalty.

And the people in his constituency are not interested having him representing them. McConnell must be out of dirty politics, for God's sake!

It was first the Democrats who ran away with now it's the Republicans hand ?

We always was n d DEMS could hav prevented tis shit n 00 by jeb bushwhacker helpn GW rig 2 win n look wat dat df got us stuck n. 16 dic poop of shit Scott thru out absentee ballots cause d fucn zip codes they rigged since zip were started

If senatemajldr throws this trial off then I hope he is placed under investigation for crimes against the United States.

Its laughable hearing you assholes say that after what we all witnessed with Schiff and Nadler.......get real.

The hypocrisy is deafening when Nancy Pelosi clearly pushed a partisan hack to impeach a best performing President based on zero evidence of wrongdoing, cry me a river Fake News + Low Ratings😴😴😴

The stench of corruption was so pervasive throughout the Obama administration it will take years to uncover and prosecute . . . . but it all must be prosecuted.

It’s simple. The solution is simple, do-able, and more likely now than ever. Elect Democrats To Congress and the Presidency. Help guide comrade mitchki to his more suitable status of a former senator. Kentucky is responsible for that though.

The language being used about the Senate vote is Remove or Acquit. Is Acquit 'official'? Or is it really remove, not remove?

They ran an unfair process. They rushed it through and now hold it up. This is not impeachment- it’s a circus and the democrats will pay for this

It's as if you don't know how a Senate trial is conducted? Google is your friend.

The truth hurt. Selective reading on this tweet.

Impeachment for mental midgets.

And the house made it fair? Hahahahahahahahahaha

No doubt Reid didn’t ask Clyburn whether: 1) It’s interference in the 2020 election if Klobuchar, Sanders and Warren vote to end their political opponent’s candidacy? 2) A Senator who publicly stated Trump should or should not be impeached can be considered impartial?

Which ones hair line is further back?

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 469. in LAW

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Rep. Khanna: 2020 election irrelevant to Trump's Senate trialCongressman Ro Khanna (D-CA) is with Hallie Jackson discussing the next steps in the President's Senate impeachment trial. Although he serves as a co-chair on Bernie Sander's campaign, he is emphatic that politics of any kind should not interfere with the trial's process.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

House and Senate in impeachment standoff over next stepsThe House is delaying sending articles of impeachment to the Senate until rules are established for a trial. Speaker Nancy Pelosi attributed the delay to needing time to establish rules of a 'fair trial,' with the speaker saying it would be difficult to name managers for an impeachment trial 'until we see the arena in which we will be participating.' Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said that he had reached an 'impasse' in his talks with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in regards to the rules of a trial. More DEM nonsense recall them ALL!!! TheDemocrats HouseDemocrats SenateDems GOP realDonaldTrump GOPChairwoman PressSec Nancy Gone Wild!!! SpeakerPelosi FoxNews sfchronicle latimes Not so. They are delaying sending the Articles to the Senate FOREVER!!! Checkmate. Thank you SpeakerPelosi for defending our Constitution! If MoscowMitch .senatemajldr refuses to preside over an impartial trial per the OathOfImpartialJustice & their OathOfOffice to defend the Constitution, then they shouldn't get the Articles of Impeachment.
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »

Key House Dem Raskin urges Pelosi to stand her ground against a 'farce' Senate trialRep. Jamie Raskin, a key member of the House Judiciary Committee, defends and explains Nancy Pelosi’s decision to delay sending the impeachment articles to the Senate, on Yahoo News’ “Skullduggery” podcast. 😂🤣 These people can’t be real.
Source: YahooNews - 🏆 380. / 59 Read more »

New House privacy proposal would curb data collection by Google and FacebookThe bill would limit how companies like Google and Facebook can use and share consumers' data and would be stronger than a strict new California law. 👁
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »