Bondi condemns House impeachment 'trial' that didn't exist

Two months ago, Donald Trump’s operation announced that former Rep. Trey Gowdy would leave his post at Fox News and instead help represent the president in the impeachment process. As regular readers know, this didn’t work out well: the New York Times reported that the day after the announcement, “the arrangement fell apart.”

Close video The Rachel Maddow Show, 12/13/19, 9:38 PM ET Bondi ties make her an awkward pick for Trump impeachment defense Rachel Maddow looks at former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi’s uncomfortable interaction with Donald Trump’s fraudulent charity, as well as her awkward proximity to elements of the criminal investigation tied to Trump’s impeachment, even as she is share tweet email save Embed Gowdy is now back at Fox News, where his apparent successor on Team Trump, former Florida...

BONDI: So, we weren’t given a fair trial in the House at all. Now it goes to the Senate, and these senators – the president deserves to be heard…. We wouldn’t be doing our job if we weren’t working hand in hand with the Senate to clear the president of this charade, this sham that started with Adam Schiff, your next guest, and we’re not going to let it continue in the U.S. Senate because we will have fair proceedings.

What’s more, note that Bondi argued that the president “deserves to be heard,” which would be a more compelling point if Team Trump hadn’t turned down invitations to be heard during the House’s impeachment proceedings.

MaddowBlog Remind me again who the hell she is?

MaddowBlog More stupidity from Clueless Maddow.

MaddowBlog This is MSM being Mealy-mouthed This also Relativism (look it up) Bondi is Lying-Tell all of 🇺🇸 she is Lying Propaganda-Obfuscation-Deflection-Deceit Bamboozlement is all the GovernmentOfPutin Will do-They are corrupt-Call It Traitorous FFS

MaddowBlog she is a strong independent woman and you have to believe what she says or you are a sexist tool

MaddowBlog Does the would be Emperor's legal shill fail to make proper distinctions? So what do you expect? Good help doesn't want to work for a kleptocractic narcissist...

MaddowBlog What would u call testimony, witnesses, held in secret? U may be right but it was a kangaroo hearing.

MaddowBlog Fairness /impartial has to do with the constitution that the Communists in the Congress threw out the window,after flashing what was supposed to be a copy of it. If it was, Pelosi must have gave them the same orders as she gave with Obama Care

MaddowBlog She’s as dumb as Trump. They talk w/o knowledge

MaddowBlog Isn’t this the chick that took bribe money from the soon to be impeached President?

MaddowBlog *o*

MaddowBlog So let’s do it again in the Senate! -Pam Bondi

MaddowBlog She was atty general right? So she knows about legal proceedings like the jury can't make up its mind BFORE the actual trial. Also prez didn't testify or offer evidence on his behalf so he can't cry about unfair proceedings! Where do they get these goofs!?

MaddowBlog

MaddowBlog They're really shoveling that coal into the gaslighting engine today...

MaddowBlog I guess Moscow Mitch will have garbage working with garbage

MaddowBlog Who?

MaddowBlog The action of an informed, objective person who wants the best for others.

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

More than 700 scholars pen letter urging House to impeach TrumpThe group of historians, legal scholars and others said in an open letter Monday night that Trump’s conduct is “a clear and present danger to the Constitution.” They should rather write letter to the Senate No one cares what liberal scholars think. SFW?
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

'Subversion of constitutional order': Nadler slams McConnell for coordinating with White House on Senate impeachment trialHouse Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler criticizes Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for saying he'd work with the White House in an impeachment trial Always said never met a Demoncrat that I ever agreed. Now,why is it that Congress men can be expelled from Congress for touching a womens breasts? On the other hand a Cabal of Congress folks can conspire to frame the POTUS on treasonous fake charges & such folks are not expelled Resign Now Nadler! 😅😅😅 I don't think they'll have the hearings in the bunker in a basement
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

Disparate group of Republican senators worry White House and GOP leaders ahead of impeachment trialSenate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer's high-profile push for witnesses to testify in the Senate's expected impeachment trial of President Donald Trump shifted attention and political pressure on Monday to a handful of Republican senators who have worked diligently to avoid the spotlight. There are a lot of respectful Republicans that are not going to go down with the ship. I have faith that they will do the right thing. They cannot be 'constutional conservatives' and turn a blind eye. Not this time, this President is not worth it.
Source: CNN - 🏆 4. / 95 Read more »

House GOP leader open to more witnesses in impeachment trialAs the House prepares for a historic Trump impeachment vote, the Chairman of House GOP Study Committee and member of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. Mike Johnson joins “The Beat.” MSNBC Chief Correspondent Ari Melber presses the Congressman about potentially illegal requests to investigate U.S. candidates and fact-checks claims that Ukraine received all the money Trump froze. AriMelber Mike Johnson also lied throughout that interview, so I wouldn’t trust a damn thing he says. AriMelber The House should have fought in the courts to get them during their deposition process. There is no way executive privilege can be magically waived at this point in the process. So now they wont have them as witnesses and their obstruction charge is moot. Hacks. AriMelber In Your Face Hypocrisy 😖... Hint - Can’t Be Trusted🤬
Source: MSNBC - 🏆 469. / 51 Read more »