Texas death row inmate Rodney Reed's request to review his claim that prosecutors at his 1998 trial illegally suppressed evidence that could have exonerated him in Stacey Stites' murder., the Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down Reed's request for justices to grant a writ of certiorari, which would have ordered a lower court to send the case record up for review.
The rejection means the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' decision to deny Reed a new trial still stands. That courtthat the testimony of new witnesses in a 2021 evidentiary hearing wouldn't have changed the outcome of Reed's original trial.In 1998, Reed was convicted of the 1996 abduction, rape and murder of 19-year-old Stites in Bastrop and was sentenced to death.
Reed has maintained his innocence, and his lawyers have requested DNA tests be conducted on crime scene evidence, including Stites' clothing and two pieces of the belt used to strangle her. Prosecutors have argued those items have been contaminated by repeated handling over the decades.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: NYAmNews - 🏆 269. / 63 Read more »
Source: sdut - 🏆 5. / 95 Read more »
Source: AKNewsNow - 🏆 460. / 53 Read more »
Source: latimes - 🏆 11. / 82 Read more »
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »