The justices toss yet another precedent, delighting conservatives

  • 📰 washingtonpost
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 72 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 32%
  • Publisher: 72%

Law Law Headlines News

Law Law Latest News,Law Law Headlines

The court overturns the 40-year-old bias for regulatory power, thrilling the right.

Mission accomplished. Power grabbed. Hubris squared, to quote Justice Elena Kagan, as yet another decades-old precedent is tossed aside.of judicial deference to federal agencies, achieves a holy grail of the conservative legal movement, years in the making and a central ambition in President Donald Trump’s selection of justices.

the rule that courts should be reluctant to cavalierly jettison their precedents — in this case one that has been the cornerstone of administrative law since 1984.Administrative law doesn’t pack the emotional punch of abortion access or LGBTQ+ rights, but the day-to-day impact of this seemingly arcane issue is profound.

did not require the court to stick with a “fundamentally misguided” ruling that had proven so “unworkable” in practice that the court had been forced repeatedly to cut it back and hadn’t even relied on it since 2016. Kagan, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson and taking the step of reading her dissent from the bench, accused the majority of continuing its campaign to arrogate to itself authority that Congress has assigned to administrative agencies. The dissent cited recent decisions overturning the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s“But evidently that was, for this Court, all too piecemeal,” Kagan wrote.

The majority’s “justification comes down, in the end, to this: Courts must have more say over regulation — over the provision of health care, the protection of the environment, the safety of consumer products, the efficacy of transportation systems, and so on,” Kagan wrote. “The majority disdains restraint, and grasps for power.”which has been cited in more than 17,000 lower court cases, “would be a convulsive shock to the legal system.

 

Thank you for your comment. Your comment will be published after being reviewed.
Please try again later.
We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

 /  🏆 95. in ERROR

Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court dismantles 40-year-old Chevron decision impacting regulatory powersThe justices overturned the 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron, long a target of conservatives.
Source: 13WHAM - 🏆 256. / 63 Read more »

Supreme Court declines to hear appeal from former TV star Josh DuggarThe Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from former reality TV star Josh Duggar, who asked the justices to toss out his child pornography conviction.
Source: WGAL - 🏆 331. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court knocks down Wall Street regulator’s in-house courtsThe justices backed a challenge to the constitutionality of the SEC’s internal tribunals — a resounding win for conservatives.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »

Supreme Court curbs federal agency power, overturning Chevron precedentThe decades-old Chevron precedent was targeted by conservatives who say the government gives too much regulatory power to federal agency bureaucrats.
Source: washingtonpost - 🏆 95. / 72 Read more »

Lawsuit claiming Mississippi Supreme Court district are discriminatory is set for AugustLawsuit notes Mississippi population is 40% Black, yet in 100 years only four Black justices have been elected.
Source: MSTODAYnews - 🏆 275. / 63 Read more »