Former President Donald Trump did manage to say one accurate thing about abortion at Thursday night’s CNN presidential debate: He’s responsible for overturning . “I put three great Supreme Court justices on the Court,” Trump said, “and they happened to vote in favor of killing Can women even be legal scholars? Asking for Brett Kavanaugh., which sought to roll back some rule changes by the FDA that made mifepristone, the first of two pills used in a medication abortion, easier to access.
The Alliance contended that a patient might be one of the rare people for whom the abortion pill didn’t work as intended, that she might then seek emergency care at a hospital, where she might encounter a provider who might belong to one of the anti-abortion groups in the lawsuit, who might be put in the position of having to perform an emergency procedure to remove the fetus.
This matters because other plaintiffs could try to bring a challenge to mifepristone back to the Supreme Court in the future—and, as some reproductive scholars have , the conservative justices appeared to signal that they’d be other to hearing other challenges to mifepristone in the future. and spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, have explicitly said a conservative Justice Department should marshal the law to criminalize “providers and distributors of pills.
Trump claims that he wouldn't block access to medication abortion—but the lie detector test determined that's a lie.Another example was Trump’s claim that he supports “exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother.” That’s great. But that so-called exceptions do not exist in real life. Moreover, many of his supporters would like him to go further and ban Democrats “will take the life of a child in the eighth month, the ninth month, and even after birth, after birth.
With all that’s at stake for equality, we are redoubling our commitment for the next 50 years. In turn, we need your help,Julianne McShane is Mother Jones’ news and engagement writer, focusing on daily news coverage and stories at the intersection of gender and inequity.‘Not a Victory,’ But ‘a Delay’: With the Supreme Court’s EMTALA Ruling, U.S. Women Are Still at Risk
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: WEWS - 🏆 323. / 59 Read more »
Source: ABC7Chicago - 🏆 284. / 63 Read more »
Source: bbchealth - 🏆 143. / 63 Read more »