The conservative-majority US Supreme Court struck down 40 years of legal precedent Friday, curbing the power of federal agencies to regulate critical issues affecting Americans' daily lives, from air quality to drug safety and more.
"Courts may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous," Roberts wrote. "In one fell swoop, the majority today gives itself exclusive power over every open issue -— no matter how expertise-driven or policy-laden -- involving the meaning of regulatory law," she said.
But the political right has since decried the ruling, saying it unfairly empowers the central government over the judiciary and means agencies can alter the meaning of statutes, depending on who is in charge. "Congress expects courts to handle technical statutory questions, and courts did so without issue in agency cases before Chevron," wrote Roberts, though he said the ruling"does not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework."
"In overruling Chevron, the Trump MAGA Supreme Court has once again sided with powerful special interests and giant corporations against the middle class and American families," added Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: politico - 🏆 381. / 59 Read more »
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »
Source: 10News - 🏆 732. / 50 Read more »
Source: KPRC2 - 🏆 80. / 68 Read more »
Source: WGAL - 🏆 331. / 59 Read more »
Source: adndotcom - 🏆 293. / 63 Read more »