The Earl Warren Building, headquarters of the Supreme Court of California, is shown in San Francisco on Jan. 7, 2020.The century-long and often tortured history of California making law through ballot measures took a new turn Thursday when the, as it’s called shorthand, would be a revision of the state constitution and cannot be proposed via initiative, rather than a constitutional amendment as its proponents contended.
The ruling was a victory not only for Newsom and legislative leaders, but for the Democratic Party’s most powerful political allies in public employee unions, which were prepared to spend tens of millions of dollars to defeat it. It was a crushing defeat for the California Business Roundtable and anti-tax groups such as the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, which had hoped that the measure, which would have required voter approval of new taxes, would block the tendency of Democratic officials in a deeply blue state to expand programs and raise taxes to pay for them when needed., which would have helped the measure’s backers potentially win in November.
State law once mandated that when measures qualified for the ballot, they could not be removed. In 2014, however, legislation was passed to allow the removal of measures by their sponsors if their issues had been adequately addressed by the Legislature.California gig worker law AB 5 withstands challenge from Uber
Law Law Latest News, Law Law Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »
Source: ladailynews - 🏆 332. / 59 Read more »
Source: CalMatters - 🏆 261. / 63 Read more »
Source: BreitbartNews - 🏆 610. / 51 Read more »
Source: mercnews - 🏆 88. / 68 Read more »